Jonathan Fryer

Writer, Lecturer, Broadcaster and Liberal Democrat Politician

Archive for the ‘Jeremy Corbyn’ Category

No, a General Election Is Not the Answer

Posted by jonathanfryer on Thursday, 10th January, 2019

jeremy corbyn 3The Leader of he Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn has made a speech calling for a general election, arguing that this is the most “practical and democratic” solution to the current Brexit impasse. Quite apart from the fact that almost all recent opinion polls suggest that Labour would not win such an election, however much Mr Corbyn may dream of being Prime Minister, with less than three months to go before EU Departure Day, a general election would be a time-consuming distraction from the matter at hand. Besides, it is hard to see how such an election would be brought about, as most of the Tory rebels who have inflicted a couple of significant defeats on the Government in recent days would not vote for an election, and it needs two thirds of the House of Commons to do so. After Jeremy Corbyn’s speech, Channel 4’s Jon Snow asked a very pertinent question about whether the Labour Leader has given thought to the young people — including those not old enough to vote in the 2016 EU Referendum — who overwhelmingly want to stay in the European Union and who back a People’s Vote. Mr Corbyn’s response was that young people would benefit from the policies of a Labour government, which completely misses the point. The sad fact is that Jeremy is a Brexiteer, despite his half-hearted support for Remain in 2016, and what he wants to try to deliver is a Labour Brexit. This again is cloud cuckoo land fantasy, as the EU has made perfectly clear that there cannot be a new Brexit negotiation. The deal brokered by the Conservative government is the only one on the table. So instead of fantasizing about going to the country in the hope of bringing about a Socialist Britain the Labour Leader should listen to his members and supporters, who by a large majority want to Remain, and back the campaign for a People’s Vote.

Advertisements

Posted in Brexit, Jeremy Corbyn, Labour, UK politics, Uncategorized | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Can the LibDems Fill the Widening Gap?

Posted by jonathanfryer on Saturday, 15th August, 2015

Tim Farron 2The divide between Britain’s two major parties appears to be getting wider by the day, as David Cameron’s Conservatives drop all pretence at being One Nation Tories and instead adopt their default position of being the party of business and the rich. Labour, meanwhile, is in love with Jeremy Corbyn, or at least the bulk of its membership and newly signed-up supporters say they are, and the trade unions are therefore salivating at the prospect of acquiring more influence on politics than has been the case for decades. The net result is a yawning centre ground, and the challenge for the Liberal Democrats will be to show that we can fill it, by promoting policies that are radical but realistic, firmly rooted in liberal values which are shared by a sizeable proportion if the UK electorate, championing fairness and equality of opportunity, civil liberties, environmentalism and internationalism. I am not suggesting that is a complete list of priorities but they should be important foundations. With a much reduced contingent in the House of Commons, and the consequent inevitable fall in media interest, the LibDems will have a hard task ahead. Tim Farron, fresh from his well-deserved holiday will have to hit the ground running, as he did by showing a moral lead vis-a-vis the refugees and migrants in Calais. Next month’s Bournemouth conference must be a springboard that will grab the headlines. And local parties really must endeavour to fight every election that comes along, big or small. A golden opportunity has arisen because of Labour’s disarray but it must be seized before it slips away.

Posted in Conservatives, David Cameron, Jeremy Corbyn, Labour, Liberal Democrats, Tim Farron | 1 Comment »

Re-engaging with Iran

Posted by jonathanfryer on Monday, 26th January, 2015

IranIran UKIt is 35 years since the Iranian Revolution and the US hostage crisis, yet the rhetoric between Tehran and the “Great Satan” America hardly seems to have varied during that time. Attempts to bring about a rapprochement faltered when it was discovered that Iran had been secretly enriching uranium, sending alarm bells ringing that it was intent on becoming a nuclear power. Such fears still linger in the minds of many US Congressmen, not to mention the Netanyahu government in Israel, which has made it clear that it would launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities if it felt its security was at stake. Israel, of course, is not a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and is widely believed to have an impressive arsenal of nuclear warheads. Iran, meanwhile, has been hit hard by sanctions, particularly from the US but also from the EU, and that was the background to an interesting seminar on Re-engagement with Iran put on by the Global Diplomatic Forum in London today. Among the speakers arguing for greater engagement were the former Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord (Norman) Lamont, who declared that Margaret Thatcher would never have tolerated the way US pressure stops some British banks from dealing with Iran, and Lord (David) Hannay, a former UK Ambassador to the UN and a Farsi speaker. Great emphasis was put on seeing Iran not as a stereotype but as a diverse and culturally rich nation with a politically very alert population. Jeremy Corbyn MP highlighted human rights issues in Iran but also argued for the Middle East to become a Nuclear Weapons Free Zone. Britain and Iran are currently considering the re-establishment of full diplomatic relations, though progress on that has been slow. It could well be, however, that progress on other issues, such as a workable deal on Iran’s nuclear programme, would progress more smoothly if the UK were once again present at ambassadorial level in Tehran.

Posted in David Hannay, Global Diplomatic Forum, Iran, Israel, Jeremy Corbyn, Norman Lamont, Nuclear non-proliferation | Leave a Comment »