Jonathan Fryer

Writer, Lecturer, Broadcaster and Liberal Democrat Politician


Posted by jonathanfryer on Sunday, 18th October, 2015

imageThe dramatic struggle for female enfranchisement in Britain is so much part of the country’s political history that it is amazing it has not been the subject of a major feature film until now. But Sarah Gavron’s “Suffragette”, which is now out on general release, has been well worth waiting for. Wisely the storyline focuses not so much on the Pankhursts (though Maryl Streep puts in a memorable cameo performance as the indomitable Emmeline; instead, it follows the politicisation and then radicalistion of an ordinary East End laundrywoman (beautifully played by Carey Mulligan) who is inspired to join the fight by a mixture of painful circumstances and the example of others. The scenes in the Bethnal Green laundry are particularly strong and evocative and the film’s whole atmosphere is skilfully created and maintained. It is a sobering thought, not least for modern Liberals, that even Lloyd George and his Ministers were not at first prepared to give way on female suffrage, preferring to believe the poppycock about women being too emotional and irrational to be trusted with the vote. Sobering, too, to think that just a century ago women were indeed second class citizens, with few rights of their own, including over their children.

imageGreat strides have been made since then, but the film is right in its implied suggestion that had Emily Davison not thrown herself in front of the King’s horse on Derby Day 1913 progress would have been a lot longer in coming. That extraordinary self-sacrifice was a shocking crime in some people’s eyes, but it galvanised much of the nation and I am glad that Sarah Gavron ends her film with real-time footage of Emily Davison’s funeral, for which Londoners lined the streets as hundreds of women in white, wearing black sashes, marched slowly behind her flower-bedecked funeral carriage.


3 Responses to “Suffragette”

  1. Paul Fox said

    Unfair to single out LG. A majority of the Liberals in the Cabinet (including LG) and of Liberals in the Commons supported reform. Crucially though, Asquith didn’t. The Labour Cabinet member, Burns, was also against. Curiously the Tory leader, Balfour was in favour of reform, but most of his party weren’t. Nonetheless a stain on the record on one of our greatest governments.

  2. jonathanfryer said

    I’d be interested to see what you think about LG’s portrayal in the film, Paul, if you see it.

  3. Paul Fox said

    I saw it on Friday, and felt he was portrayed as sympathetic to the cause in the hearing he chaired, although protocol of the time might have obscured this to the casual viewer. However later he seemed to be portrayed as betraying the cause when the amendment was withdrawn / lost (not sure which) and by implication indifferent to the police violence that followed. I felt this was unfair, Asquith should have featured rather than LG,

    Ironic given one of Asquith’s great children starred in the film.

    Even more ironic that Helena was interviewed on the BBC and claimed not to have been previously aware of the force feeding / police violence!

    I also wasn’t sure if Emily Wilding Davidson’s sacrifice was the turning point implied or whether it was the reliance on women in WW1.

    Excellent film nonetheless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: