Jonathan Fryer

Writer, Lecturer, Broadcaster and Liberal Democrat Politician

Time to Scrutinise UKIP

Posted by jonathanfryer on Thursday, 25th July, 2013

UKIP comes under some uncomfortable scrutiny from:

Rebecca Taylor (Liberal Democrat Member of the European Parliament) and Petros Fassoulas (Chairman of the European Movement UK), who write:

Rebecaa TaylorUKIP MEPs are infamous for being not just Britain’s laziest members of the European Parliament, but among the laziest in Europe, as figures from VoteWatch and EP Committee minutes have shown (and the Mirror graphically exposed recently). UKIP MEPs’ excuse for their lack of graft is that their job is to get the UK out of the EU and they don’t need to bother with anything else, like actually representing their constituents’ interests in Brussels. Of course if they were politicians of principle, they could refuse to take their seats after elected. But then they would forfeit their MEP salary and allowances, which they don’t seem keen to do. In fact UKIP are on record as boasting about how much money their MEPs claim, for not doing their jobs properly. This not being enough, two UKIP MEPs were jailed for expense fraud and benefit fraud and last year two further UKIP MEPs were forced to repay nearly £40k to the European Parliament after being found to have used allowances improperly. In addition, UKIP MEPs are far less transparent than MEPs from other UK parties, who publish their expenses on their websites and regularly update them (Rebecca Taylor’s can be found here).

Mr Farage was caught out by the BBC’s Andrew Neil, when he was asked why he and his deputy Mr Nuttall had not published their expenses for 2 years despite promising to do so. Mr Farage was unable to produce a convincing response, saying instead that he was “very busy” and that he had “lost some receipts”. But what does Nigel Farage does while he is in Brussels, paid by British tax payers? Does he stand up for British interests? Does he work on legislation that will improve the life of his constituents? No, of course not, he spends his time avoiding committee meetings and failing to vote even on issues that are important for the UK. European Liberal group leader Guy Verhofstadt famously accused Nigel Farage of being the EU’s biggest waste of money. He has a point. Mr Farage has failed to attend 48% of Plenary votes, has never drafted a report and he is joint bottom when it comes to Parliamentary questions asked. As the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) is important for the fishing industry in the South East of England, the region Mr Farage represents, he has tried to make it look like he was doing something by “campaigning”, which seemed to be limited to sending out angry press releases. However, he has never bothered to take part in Fisheries Committee meetings and when mammoth cross-party efforts by centre-right, Socialist, Liberal and Green MEPs ensured an historic reform of the CFP, which will end overfishing and safeguard the future of the fishing industry in Europe, Mr Farage was nowhere to be found. He did not even bother to show up to the fisheries committee final vote (which was very close) and he disappeared halfway through the plenary vote. In fact, according to Committee minutes, he attended just one of 42 Fisheries Committee meetings between February 2010 and January 2013, when he resigned from all Committees. Which is consistent with UKIP’s record; UKIP MEPs have attended just 30% of Committee meetings.

European Parliament BrusselsWhich is a real shame and huge waste. The real graft in Brussels is done in committee, so by skipping committee meetings UKIP miss the chance to exert any influence and help shape laws that affect their constituents. They claim that there is no point as they would be outvoted every time, which is patently ridiculous when key votes can (and often do) go one way or another with only a vote to spare. Committee work requires an MEP to understand the proposal in question, meet with businesses, NGOs, pressure groups, ordinary citizens, trade unions, national government representatives etc. to hear their positions, develop amendments that will not only be workable, but will also get sufficient support from their political group as well as other MEPs, and keep track of the hundreds, sometimes thousands of other amendments. Doing all this properly is hard work and very time consuming, so no wonder UKIP MEPs prefer to prance round the UK making speeches to their followers and sending out angry press releases instead. Much easier! UKIP’s deputy leader Paul Nuttall MEP is a point in case. He is a Member of the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee, but in nearly three years had attended only twice. According to figures by VoteWatch he is 736th (out of 753 MEPs) when it comes to Plenary sessions attended. He is joint bottom both for reports and opinions drafted (actually he hasn’t drafted a single one!). This is again “out of principle”; he thinks his time would be better used elsewhere. Or he does until he realises he might get some bad publicity as happened recently. The Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee recently debated and voted on the EU tobacco directive, which included the regulation of e-cigarettes. Like-minded MEPs from several parties worked to table sensible amendments on e-cigarettes and it all came to head in the Committee vote. Knowing that the key amendment on e-cigarettes required all the votes it could get and that Mr Nuttall never attends committee, e-cigarettes users (some of whom were Mr Nuttall’s constituents) were encouraged to contact his office. Some were ignored, some received the same generic e-mail response they had received several months previously, and at least one was told Mr Nuttall would not attend the tobacco directive vote. They were dismayed and began complaining about him on Twitter. Then all of a sudden Mr Nuttall changed his mind and showed up at the Committee meeting (his 3rd visit in 3 years!), although he didn’t bother to vote on many amendments.

This experience was a great opportunity for many voters to realise that while UKIP shout loudly, they do very little else. Many of them expressed surprise; UKIP like to portray themselves as standing up for “ordinary British people”; what they actually do is ignore the very people they claim to represent. Needless to say, Mr Nuttall’s constituents were left unimpressed, but at least they were able to compare the efforts to shape EU laws made by hard working LibDem MEPs (among others) with the “blink-and-you’ll-miss-it” work done by UKIP MEPs. Mr Nuttall’s attitude shows that UKIP MEPs are indeed lazy, exactly because they think they can get away with it. They claim to be avoiding the hard graft of parliamentary committee work out of principle, but those principles are soon chucked by the wayside if they suspect they will get any bad publicity. Put under a little scrutiny, especially by UK voters who are vocal, active on social media and in regular contact with broadcast media, and suddenly UKIP MEPs decide that attending EP Committees is not such a waste of time after all.

Time for a lot more scrutiny of UKIP!

(This article first appeared on the European Movement UK’s euroblog)


5 Responses to “Time to Scrutinise UKIP”

  1. Sophie said

    People don’t vote for UKIP to try and change the EU. They vote for them to express their disgust at having to remain part of this unbureaucratic and unsavoury organisation. It does not matter if UKIP MEPs choose not to vote on piddling little amendments to pointless and unwanted legislation, what matters is they want out. I am confident they will come first in 2014 as people will continue to use their vote in the only way they can to force a referendum, the one promised by the Lib Dems, the Cons and Labour. You can smear away it only helps the UKIP cause.

  2. jonathanfryer said

    Funny how UKIP is forever merrily spouting lies and distortions about the EU but when someone writes the evidence-based truth about certain UKIP MEPs they are accused of “smearing”! But then so many UKIP supporters seem happy to live in an Alice in Wonderland world in which everything is upside down!

    • Sophie said

      I freely admit that UKIP MEPs turn up less often but the point is they are not voted in by the British voter to do more.The goal is for every UKIP MEP along with every other British MEP to receive their P45. There is little point in you wasting your energy into scrutinising, if you prefer that over smearing, you should be debating the merits of your beloved EU. As it stands the Lib Dems are predicted fourth if not fifth behind the Greens in the Euro elections you are not helping your work colleagues by focusing on UKIP you will only promote them. They’re are some very dedicated Lib Dem MEPs out there, I can’t agree with their views but doing a Ken Clarke will do you no favours.

  3. […] 3. Time to scrutinise UKIP by Jonathan Fryer on Jonathan Fryer. Jonathan posts Rebecca Taylor’s analysis of how useless UKIP are in the European Parliament. […]

    • Michael Berridge said

      Glad I was pointed towards this one. Of course if UKIP members at Brussels were principled, they would decline to take their seats (like Sinn Fein at Westminster); but it’s all about the money…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: