Jonathan Fryer

Writer, Lecturer, Broadcaster and Liberal Democrat Politician

Ann Widdecombe at the NLC

Posted by jonathanfryer on Friday, 25th January, 2008

ann-widdicombe.jpgThe Gladstone Club took the adventurous decision to have the Rt Hon Ann Widdecombe, MP — aka Doris Karloff  (pace the Daily Mirror)– as guest speaker at its annual dinner at the National Liberal Club last night. The place was pretty packed, as we had all come along hoping to be challenged, and duly were. Her chosen theme was Freedom of Speech, though that did not stop her ranging over a whole spectrum of issues and anecdotes, some funny, most feisty, and some downright disturbing (well, for a true Liberal, anyway).

I was struck by what seemed to me to be a basic inconsistency in her argument. She defended the right of the Oxford Union to host a debate at which Nick Griffin and David Irving spoke, even if what they said might be offensive to Jews, Muslims, immigrants or whoever — a position I can intellectually sympathise with. But she then said it was perfectly all right for printers to refuse to print flyers announcing a Gay Rights march. To me that sounded like giving bigots a free rein to attack groups they disapprove of, but not to allow people to promote their rghts. This inconsistency she justified, when questioned, on the grounds of individual conscience.

Now, I can understand why someone might have a conscientious objection to carrying out an abortion, or doing active service in the army. But I do not see that the right to be prejudiced against particular sections of our diverse society should somehow be sacrosanct. Fifty years ago, one could sometimes see in the windows of lodgings ‘No Blacks or Irish’. That today is, quite rightly, illegal. Recent legislation relating to the equal provision of services irrespective of sexual orientation has remedied a glaring lacuna in the law. It was good to have the opportunity to hear Ms Widdicombe outline her views. But even better to have the opportunity to tell her why I think she is wrong.  


One Response to “Ann Widdecombe at the NLC”

  1. So you are saying that a business should be forced to print something which they don’t wish to?

    I agree with Widdecombe here (and that makes me feel a bit dirty :-p). It has nothing to do with whether you think its the right thing to do, it is all to do with individual freedom.
    As soon as the state starts telling people who they can and cannot do business with you are down the road of authoritarianism. Individual freedom has been trampled upon, and not in the name of preventing harm. There’s no monopoly on printers, if a printer wishes to be so stupid as to lose business over such a thing then let them.

    I think it is also the wrong way round with the ‘No Blacks or Irish’ thing. That wouldn’t be acceptable in most places today, which is why it has now become illegal. In practice if a landlord wanted that policy he could still have it, just less blatantly (and a landlord still has the right to refuse service to anyone, they could just refuse service to someone they didn’t like).
    The societal change is a good thing, many people would refuse to go to pub which had such an attitude, I know everyone I know would (given some of those people, that’s a lot of potential custom lost). I’m just not so sure the law is such a good thing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: