London’s European Election Results
Posted by jonathanfryer on Tuesday, 9th June, 2009
Now that the dust has settled, one can take a rational view of the outcome of the European elections in London. The most striking thing for me is the way that Labour’s vote in the capital proved remarkably resilient, compared with the party’s performance in most of the rest of the country. Though they did lose one seat (almost inevitable with the reduction in the number of London seats from nine to eight), Labour retained a very strong second place. Moreover, they held on to a local council seat in a concurrent by-election in Prince’s ward, Lambeth, despite a swing there to the Liberal Democrats.
The Conservatives proved once again that they are good at getting their vote out. They were obviously well organised, not only in strongholds such as Barnet and Bromley, but also in target boroughs such as Tower Hamlets. The Tories may not have much time for the European Union, but they certainly took these election seriously, treating them as a dry-run for the forthcoming general election and building up in areas in which they hope to make gains in the London local council elections next year.
In principle, the Liberal Democrats were doing the same. And indeed, this strategy worked well in held and target seats, which got plenty of literature and had concerted campaigns, including telephone knocking-up of postal voters and on polling day. The LibDems therefore performed strongly in the south-western ‘golden triangle’ of Richmond, Kingston and Sutton, excellently in Haringey, well in Camden, Lambeth (Streatham), Brent, Southwark, Islington etc, though apparently haemorrhaging some votes to the Greens. Up-and-coming boroughs like Waltham Forest did well in parts. But the black holes — mainly in the east and south east – fared poorly. An unavoidable challenge for the party in dealing with future London-wide PR election will be to build support and accurate data in boroughs such as Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Bexley. Interestingly, the BNP did best in those three boroughs, though overall the BNP vote was slightly down on its GLA percentage last year and the party came nowhere near winning a seat.
UKIP sank to fifth place, behind the Greens, though still hanging on to one MP. The Greens were justifiably pleased with their performance, though they still only got a little over 10 per cent, well below what some of the opinion polls were suggesting. London voters were spoilt for choice when it came to parties and independents to whom they could allocate a protest vote. Amongst the ragbag of little parties and independents, the one that stands out most is the Tamil independent, Jan Jananayagam, who garnered over 50,000 votes in a ballot-box extension of the Parliament Square demonstrations. It is interesting (though futile!) to speculate how the results might have been different in places with large Tamil communities, such as Sutton and Brent, had she not stood.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, 9th June, 2009 at 9:00 am and is filed under Uncategorized. Tagged: Barking and Dagenham, Barnet, Bexley, BNP, Brent, Bromley, Camden, Conservatives, European elections, European Union, GLA, Greens, Haringey, Havering, Islington, Jan Jananayagam, Kingston, Labour, Lambeth, Liberal Democrats, Prince's ward Lambeth, Richmond, Southwark, Streatham, Sutton, Tamil, Tower Hamlets, UKIP, Waltham Forest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Dinti Batstone said
Excellent analysis Jonathan. We are all so sorry that you narrowly missed again.
Just to flesh out the point about ‘black holes’ – even a little work in these areas can go a long way. In my own Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham, we were delighted to see at the count that in the 4 wards where we have done some work (including our target ward where the local team has done a lot of work!) our vote share was around 18%, significantly above both the London and H&F average. To get this level of support in a Tory/ Labour marginal constituency where we have no Councillors shows just what can be achieved, even when starting from a low base (in the GLA elections last year we got less than 10%).
Half the elections we now fight in London are fought on PR and we need to work out how best to shore up our vote in ‘black hole’ areas without undermining the targeting stategy which serves us so well in General and Council elections.
Liberal Conspiracy » Top Stories & Blog Review - Wednesday 10th June said
[...] Jonathan Fryer Takes a rational look at the European Election results in London. [...]
David Bartlett said
I think it would now be interesting for someone to do a crisp statistical analysis of our good areas versus the black holes and therefore “prove” that things should be done differently regarding list elections – the GLA, Euros and soon hopefully a reformed voting system everywhere; but even that, starting right now, a change to the Party’s campaigning mindset is what is most needed.